ABOUT BENCH FORUMS PODCAST LOGIN REGISTER
PC Components
Smartphones & tablets
Systems
ENTERPRISE & IT
GUIDES

Mushkin XP2 PC2-5300 DDR2 – Xtreme Performance Memory

 by Steve Carmel & Wesley Fink on March 28, 2006 12:01 AM EST
11 Comments | Add A Comment
11 Comments
A Closer Look

Mushkin ships this product in a simple, plastic clamshell package, which you can see in the image below.

Once the package is opened from the 3 plastic dimples located on the top and side, you can see the information card plus the actual memory modules. The stark black aluminum heat spreaders are quite attractive and the Mushkin name is certainly hard to miss.

Should you ever have any type of warranty or RMA claim, you will need the product information card, as Mushkin requires all the original packaging for returns.

A closer view of the memory modules shows a sparse product information label, with no timing information provided. This particular review sample was labeled correctly as part number 991512, in a 2 GB dual pack.


Click to enlarge.

Zooming in on the label shows how little information is provided to consumers by Mushkin on this product.

Looking down at the new heat spreader, you can easily see the scalloped open design at the top of each module – allowing for much better airflow with the top of the heat spreader extended upwards, as seen in the image below.

From a top to bottom aspect, we can take another look at the module design and come to our own conclusions.

Finally, let us examine in detail how the module appears when flash is used to expose more detail in the image below. You will note the thermal tape that is being used by Mushkin in this newer heat spreader design and the overall open design of the actual heat spreader itself.

Index Mushkin XP2 PC2-5300 DDR2: Test Setup
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
Comments Locked

11 Comments

View All Comments

  • PrinceGaz - Tuesday, March 28, 2006 - link

    "I know that the built in spreaders are fantastic for heat dissapation"

    There is a lot of debate over whether heatspreaders made any difference at all even with the hotter running DDR modules at 2.5V+. Many people believe the heatspreaders are more to do with making them look good rather than perform better. I really don't know either way as all the heatspreaders on my DDR modules seem to do is give a larger flat surface area for the heat to be dissipated from after the heat has been conducted from the individual chips (the heatspreaders even with overvolted modules don't feel particularly warm), and I'm unconvinced if
    (a) there is any significant surface area in contact between the chips and heatspreader, let alone whether any thermal compound was used
    (b) that might mean you would get better heat dissipation *without* a heatspreader as the cool air would be blowing directly over the memory chips themselves instead of having a heatspreader in the way

    Given that DDR modules at normal voltages (up to 3V anyway, I'm not talking about the OCZ modules that could take 3.5V or so -- more than old SDRAM even) without getting very warm, why would cooler running DDR2 need heatspreaders unless pushed up from 1.8V to at least 2.3V. Memory chips don't give off much heat even when over-volted so heat-spreaders seem unnecessary, especially on DDR2 modules. Once you combine that with the fact that at least half the surface area of a memory module without a heatspreader is taken up by the memory chips anyway, there doesn't really seem much point in adding something to "spread" the heat over what is only a slightly larger area.

    I will concede that heatspreaders look good though, and the minimal cost of them is returned many times in every premium module they sell with them.
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.
BENCH
TOPICS
FOLLOW
ABOUT

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now