Expensive Quad Sockets vs. Ubiquitous Dual Sockets
by Johan De Gelas on October 6, 2009 1:00 AM EST- Posted in
- IT Computing
The Number One Reason for Quad Socket
VMmark - which we discussed in great detail here - tries to measure typical consolidation workloads: a combination of a light mail server, database, fileserver, and website with a somewhat heavier java application. One VM is just sitting idle, representative of workloads that have to be online but which perform very little work (for example, a domain controller). In short, VMmark goes for the scenario where you want to consolidate lots and lots of smaller apps on one physical server.
The VMmark scores of the Xeon X5570 make some of the quad socket platforms look silly - once again. The 16 "Shanghai" cores are 13% slower and the 24 "Dunnington" cores are 15% slower than the eight cores with SMT of the X5570. While raw processing power and the excellent optimizations for Hyper-Threading are the main reasons why the X5570 is superior, we suspect it is not the only reason. We'll discuss this in more detail later in this article. Luckily for AMD, the quad Opteron 8435 stays out of the reach of Intel's best server platform.
32 Comments
View All Comments
Casper42 - Tuesday, October 6, 2009 - link
I know its late, but on page 4 of this article you say your using a Dual 2389 setup where each chip is Quad Core.Somehow that morphs into a "Quad Opteron 2389" on page 6 both in the text and in the graphic. Since a Quad 2xxx is not possible, is this a Dual 2389 or a Quad 8389?
Then on page 7 it becomes a Quad Opteron 8389
Am I losing my mind?
I see now that both a Quad 8389 and a Dual 2389 are listed in Page 4, but why on earth did you guys bounce back and forth so much between them?
JohanAnandtech - Tuesday, October 6, 2009 - link
You are not losing your mind. The Quad 2389 is a quad 8389 of course. I have fixed the error. Thanks.The dual sockets machines were mostly used to check how the software scales (MS SQL server, virtualization) and how the power consumption compares to the quad socket machines. I hope this makes it clear?